Biofortification as a Sustainable Strategy to Combat Malnutrition and Hidden Hunger

Introduction

Malnutrition remains one of the most pressing global health challenges of the 21st century, affecting billions of people worldwide in multiple forms. According to the World Health Organization, malnutrition affects approximately 2 billion people globally, with micronutrient deficiency—commonly known as “hidden hunger”—representing a particularly insidious form of malnutrition that compromises immune function, cognitive development, and overall health outcomes (WHO, 2020). Hidden hunger is characterized by insufficient intake of essential vitamins and minerals despite adequate caloric consumption, affecting nearly half of the global population and causing poor physical and mental development in children and a wide range of illnesses [1]. This condition is most prevalent among young girls, women, and pre-school children who suffer particularly from inadequate consumption of vitamins and micronutrients [2]. The burden of micronutrient deficiency extends beyond individual health consequences to encompass broader socioeconomic implications. Vitamin A deficiency alone is responsible for approximately 4,500 preventable child deaths daily, while iron and zinc deficiencies contribute to anemia, stunting, and impaired cognitive development affecting millions worldwide [3]. Traditional approaches to addressing malnutrition, including supplementation programs and conventional food fortification, while valuable, face significant limitations in terms of sustainability, accessibility, and long-term effectiveness, particularly in resource-poor settings where the burden of hidden hunger is most severe.

This critical situation has led to the emergence of biofortification as a promising and sustainable agricultural strategy that addresses malnutrition at its source. Biofortification is defined as the process of enhancing the vitamin and mineral content of staple crops through plant breeding, genetic engineering, or agronomic practices [4]. Unlike conventional fortification methods that require additional processing and infrastructure, biofortification creates nutrient-dense crops that deliver enhanced nutrition through the regular consumption of staple foods that populations already grow, purchase, and consume daily. This approach represents a paradigm shift in nutrition intervention, offering a cost-effective and sustainable solution that can reach rural populations who may have limited access to diverse diets or commercially fortified foods.

The sustainability of biofortification lies in its inherent integration with existing agricultural systems and food chains. Once developed, biofortified crops can be grown using traditional farming methods, requiring no additional inputs or behavioral changes from farmers or consumers [5]. This approach offers particular advantages in addressing the primary micronutrient deficiencies of global concern, including vitamin A, iron, and zinc, which are responsible for the majority of diet-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. By focusing on staple crops such as rice, wheat, maize, pearl millet, beans, and sweet potato, biofortification can address the nutritional needs of the world’s most vulnerable populations while supporting local food systems and agricultural biodiversity. The success of biofortification is exemplified by developments such as Golden Rice, a genetically modified rice variety engineered to produce beta-carotene (provitamin A) to combat vitamin A deficiency [6]. Golden Rice contains up to 35 μg β-carotene per gram of rice and has demonstrated proven potential as a cost-effective intervention where rice is the staple crop [7]. Similarly, iron and zinc biofortification programs have shown promising results in addressing anemia and zinc deficiency through conventional breeding approaches [8]. These advances, coupled with improvements in plant breeding techniques including marker-assisted selection and genomic approaches, have accelerated the development of biofortified varieties with enhanced nutrient content and improved agronomic traits. As the global community continues to address malnutrition and work toward sustainable development goals, biofortification emerges as a critical tool in the arsenal against hidden hunger. Its integration into national and international food strategies, combined with supportive policies and continued research investment, offers hope for creating a world where adequate nutrition is accessible to all through sustainable and scalable agricultural solutions [9]. The evidence base supporting biofortification continues to grow, demonstrating its potential as a complementary approach to existing nutrition interventions and its capacity to make a meaningful impact on global malnutrition.

Biofortification: An Innovative Nutritional Solution

Historical Evolution and Conceptual Framework

Biofortification emerged as a revolutionary approach to address global malnutrition, particularly micronutrient deficiencies affecting over two billion people worldwide [10]. The concept was first articulated in the 1990s by Howarth Bouis at the International Food Policy Research Institute, who recognized that enhancing the nutritional content of staple crops could provide a sustainable solution to hidden hunger [11]. Unlike traditional fortification methods that involve adding nutrients to processed foods, biofortification focuses on increasing the bioavailable nutrient content of crops through agricultural practices, plant breeding, or biotechnology [12]. The conceptual framework of biofortification is built upon the understanding that micronutrient deficiencies primarily affect populations in developing countries who rely heavily on staple crops for their caloric intake [13]. These populations often have limited access to diverse diets, fortified foods, or micronutrient supplements, making biofortified crops an ideal delivery vehicle for essential nutrients [14].

 Mechanisms of Nutrient Enhancement in Crops

The mechanisms underlying nutrient enhancement in crops involve complex physiological and biochemical processes that regulate nutrient uptake, translocation, and accumulation in edible plant tissues [15]. For iron biofortification, the primary mechanisms include enhanced iron uptake from soil through improved root acquisition strategies, increased iron translocation from roots to shoots, and enhanced iron loading into seeds or storage organs [15]. Plants utilize two distinct iron uptake strategies: Strategy I involves the reduction of Fe³⁺ to Fe²⁺ by ferric reductase enzymes, while Strategy II employs phytosiderophores to chelate iron in the rhizosphere [16]. Zinc enhancement mechanisms focus on improving zinc uptake efficiency through root architecture modifications and enhanced transporter activity [17]. The ZIP (Zinc-regulated transporter/Iron-regulated transporter Proteins) family of transporters plays crucial roles in zinc homeostasis and biofortification efforts [18]. Figure 1 shows the achieving of nutrients enhancement in crops by stepwise.

Pathways to Biofortification

Agronomic Practices and Soil Management

Agronomic biofortification represents the most immediate and cost-effective approach to enhancing crop nutrient content through optimized fertilization and soil management practices [19]. Zinc biofortification through soil and foliar zinc applications has demonstrated significant success across various crops, with studies showing 2-8 fold increases in grain zinc concentrations in cereals [20]. Similarly, selenium biofortification through soil amendments and foliar applications has proven effective in increasing selenium content in crops, as demonstrated in Finland’s national selenium supplementation program [21]. Soil pH management is critical for nutrient availability, as alkaline soils often limit iron and zinc bioavailability [22]. Organic matter incorporation enhances nutrient retention and improves soil structure, facilitating better root development and nutrient uptake [23].

Conventional Breeding Techniques

Conventional breeding approaches leverage natural genetic variation within crop species to develop biofortified varieties with enhanced nutrient content [24]. The HarvestPlus program, launched in 2004, has been instrumental in developing iron-rich beans, zinc-enhanced wheat and rice, and vitamin A-enriched sweet potato, cassava, and maize through conventional breeding methods [25]. Marker-assisted selection has accelerated breeding progress by enabling the identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with nutrient accumulation [26]. For iron biofortification in rice, QTL mapping has identified several chromosomal regions controlling iron accumulation in polished rice grains [27].

Genetic Engineering and Modern Biotechnologies

Genetic engineering offers precise control over nutrient enhancement by introducing specific genes or modifying metabolic pathways [28]. Golden Rice, developed through genetic modification to produce β-carotene in rice endosperm, represents a landmark achievement in provitamin A biofortification [29]. The technology involves introducing genes for phytoene synthase and phytoene desaturase to establish the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway in rice grains [30].

Iron biofortification through genetic engineering has focused on increasing iron storage proteins like ferritin and improving iron bioavailability by reducing antinutrients such as phytic acid [31]. Transgenic approaches have successfully enhanced iron content in rice, wheat, and legumes through ferritin overexpression and nicotianamine synthase gene introduction [32].

Nutritional Targets and Crop Priorities

Micronutrients of Concern: Iron, Zinc, Vitamin A, and Others

Iron deficiency anemia affects approximately 1.6 billion people globally, making iron a primary target for biofortification efforts (WHO, 2015). The bioavailability of iron from plant sources is generally lower than from animal sources due to the presence of inhibitors like phytic acid and tannins [33]. Biofortification strategies aim to increase not only iron content but also iron bioavailability through the enhancement of promoters like ascorbic acid and the reduction of inhibitors [34]. Zinc deficiency affects over one billion people worldwide and is associated with growth retardation, immune dysfunction, and increased mortality [35]. Biofortification efforts target zinc accumulation in edible tissues while maintaining adequate zinc bioavailability [36]. Vitamin A deficiency remains a leading cause of preventable childhood blindness, affecting 250 million children globally (WHO, 2009). Provitamin A carotenoids, particularly β-carotene, serve as precursors for vitamin A synthesis and represent key targets for biofortification [37].

Selection of Staple Crops for Biofortification Efforts

The selection of target crops for biofortification depends on their contribution to daily caloric intake, consumption patterns, and technical feasibility of nutrient enhancement [38]. Rice, wheat, and maize, which provide approximately 50% of global caloric intake, represent priority crops for biofortification efforts [39]. Legumes, including beans, lentils, and cowpeas, serve as important protein sources and naturally accumulate higher levels of iron and zinc compared to cereals. Root and tuber crops like sweet potato, cassava, and potato are particularly important in sub-Saharan Africa and offer opportunities for vitamin A and mineral biofortification.

Key Biofortified Crops and Nutrients

Staple Crops Targeted for Biofortification

Biofortification strategies have primarily focused on major staple crops that constitute the dietary foundation for billions of people worldwide. Rice (Oryza sativa), wheat (Triticum aestivum), maize (Zea mays), sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), and common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) represent the most significant targets for nutrient enhancement programs [7]. These crops were selected based on their widespread consumption, particularly among populations most vulnerable to micronutrient deficiencies, and their genetic potential for nutrient enhancement through conventional breeding or genetic engineering approaches.

Rice biofortification has achieved remarkable success with the development of high-zinc varieties that can provide up to 50% of the daily zinc requirement in populations where rice constitutes the primary dietary staple [12]. Similarly, wheat biofortification programs have focused on enhancing zinc and iron content, with some varieties showing 2-3 fold increases in these essential minerals compared to conventional cultivars [15]. Sweet potato biofortification for vitamin A has demonstrated exceptional outcomes, with orange-fleshed varieties providing substantial beta-carotene content that addresses vitamin A deficiency in sub-Saharan Africa [23].

Micronutrients Enhanced

The primary micronutrients targeted in biofortification programs include iron, zinc, and provitamin A carotenoids, which address the most prevalent deficiencies affecting over two billion people globally [19]. Iron biofortification focuses on combating iron deficiency anemia, particularly in women and children, through enhanced iron content in staple crops. Zinc biofortification addresses stunting and immune dysfunction associated with zinc deficiency, while provitamin A enhancement targets vitamin A deficiency that causes blindness and increases mortality risk in developing countries.

Recent advances have expanded biofortification efforts to include folate, vitamin E, and other essential nutrients. Folate biofortification in rice and wheat aims to reduce neural tube defects and support maternal health, while vitamin E enhancement contributes to antioxidant protection and immune function [27]. The selection of target nutrients depends on regional deficiency patterns, crop consumption habits, and the technical feasibility of enhancement through available breeding technologies. Figure 2 shows the steps towards the security of global nutrient.

Examples of Successful Biofortification Programs

HarvestPlus, the leading global biofortification program, has achieved significant milestones in developing and disseminating nutrient-enhanced crops. The program has released over 200 varieties of biofortified crops across 30 countries, reaching more than 10 million farming households [2]. Notable successes include high-iron pearl millet in India, high-zinc wheat in Pakistan, and orange sweet potato in multiple African countries.

The orange sweet potato program in sub-Saharan Africa exemplifies successful biofortification implementation, with varieties containing 15-20 times more beta-carotene than white varieties. Studies have demonstrated significant improvements in vitamin A status among children consuming these varieties, with some populations achieving adequate vitamin A levels after program implementation [21]. Similarly, high-zinc wheat varieties released in Pakistan have shown measurable improvements in zinc status among consuming populations.

Synergizing Biofortification with Other Nutrition Strategies

Complementarity with Supplementation and Fortification

Biofortification represents a sustainable complement to existing nutrition interventions rather than a replacement strategy. While supplementation provides immediate high-dose nutrient delivery and fortification enhances processed foods, biofortification addresses rural populations with limited access to supplements or fortified products [31]. The three approaches demonstrate synergistic potential when implemented in coordinated programs that address different population segments and nutritional contexts.

The comparative advantages of biofortification include its sustainability, cost-effectiveness after initial development, and ability to reach rural populations through existing agricultural systems. However, biofortification typically provides lower nutrient concentrations compared to supplements, requiring longer-term consumption for measurable health impacts [18].  Integration strategies that combine biofortified crops with targeted supplementation for high-risk groups and fortification of commonly consumed processed foods can maximize population-level nutrition outcomes.

Role in Food Security and Sustainable Agriculture

Biofortification contributes to food security by maintaining or improving crop yields while enhancing nutritional quality. Many biofortified varieties demonstrate comparable or superior agronomic performance to conventional varieties, ensuring farmer adoption without productivity losses [8]. The technology aligns with sustainable agriculture principles by reducing reliance on external inputs for nutrition improvement and supporting crop genetic diversity through the development of locally adapted varieties.

Climate resilience represents an additional benefit of biofortification programs, as many enhanced varieties incorporate traits for drought tolerance, disease resistance, and adaptation to marginal environments. These characteristics support food security in regions most vulnerable to climate change impacts while simultaneously addressing malnutrition challenges [13].

Future Perspectives and Recommendations

Scaling Up Biofortification Programs Globally

Global scaling of biofortification requires coordinated efforts across research institutions, governments, and international organizations. Priority actions include expanding crop coverage to include indigenous and locally important species, developing regional breeding programs, and establishing sustainable seed systems for biofortified varieties [11]. Technology transfer mechanisms must be strengthened to ensure developing countries can access and adapt biofortification technologies to local conditions.

Policy Support and Multi-sectoral Collaboration

Effective biofortification scaling requires supportive policy environments that incentivize research, development, and adoption of nutrient-enhanced crops. Policy frameworks should integrate biofortification into national nutrition strategies, agricultural development programs, and food security initiatives [10]. Multi-sectoral collaboration between agriculture, health, and nutrition sectors is essential for coordinated implementation and impact assessment.

Research Needs and Technological Innovations

Future research priorities include developing rapid screening methods for nutrient content, understanding nutrient bioavailability and retention during food processing, and establishing comprehensive impact evaluation frameworks. Technological innovations in genomics, precision breeding, and biotechnology offer opportunities to accelerate biofortification development and expand the range of enhanced traits  [21]. Consumer acceptance studies and market development strategies remain critical for ensuring successful adoption of biofortified varieties.

Conclusion

Biofortification represents a paradigm shift in global nutrition intervention, offering a sustainable and scalable solution to combat malnutrition and hidden hunger affecting billions worldwide. The evidence demonstrates that biofortification successfully addresses the root causes of micronutrient deficiency by enhancing the nutritional quality of staple crops that vulnerable populations already consume daily. Through diverse approaches including conventional breeding, genetic engineering, and agronomic practices, biofortification programs have achieved remarkable success in developing nutrient-enhanced varieties that maintain or improve agricultural productivity while delivering essential vitamins and minerals. The sustainability of biofortification lies in its integration with existing agricultural systems, requiring no additional inputs or behavioral changes from farmers and consumers once varieties are developed. This approach complements rather than replaces existing nutrition interventions, creating synergistic opportunities when combined with supplementation and fortification programs. Future success depends on continued research investment, supportive policy frameworks, and multi-sectoral collaboration to scale programs globally. As the world works toward sustainable development goals, biofortification emerges as a critical tool for creating equitable access to adequate nutrition through agricultural innovation, offering hope for addressing malnutrition challenges while supporting food security and sustainable agriculture in an era of climate change and growing global population demands.

References

Ye, X., Al-Babili, S., Klöti, A., Zhang, J., Lucca, P., Beyer, P., & Potrykus, I. (2000). Engineering the provitamin A (β-carotene) biosynthetic pathway into (carotenoid-free) rice endosperm. Science, 287(5451), 303-305.

Akond, A. S. M. G. M., Khandaker, L., Berthold, J., Gates, L., Peters, K., Delong, H., & Hossain, K. (2011). Anthocyanin, total polyphenols and antioxidant activity of common bean. American Journal of Food Technology, 6(5), 385-394.

Alfthan, G., Eurola, M., Ekholm, P., Venäläinen, E. R., Root, T., Korkalainen, K., Hartikainen, H., Salminen, P., Hietaniemi, V., Saastamoinen, M., & Aro, A. (2015). Effects of nationwide addition of selenium to fertilizers on foods, and animal and human health in Finland. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 91(1), 1-15.

Alloway, B. J. (2008). Zinc in soils and crop nutrition. International Zinc Association.

Anuradha, K., Agarwal, S., Rao, Y. V., Rao, K. V., Viraktamath, B. C., & Sarla, N. (2012). Mapping QTLs and candidate genes for iron and zinc concentrations in unpolished rice of Madhukar× Swarna RILs. Gene, 508(2), 233-240.

Boonyaves, K., Wu, T. Y., Gruissem, W., & Bhullar, N. K. (2017). Enhanced grain iron levels in rice expressing an iron-regulated metal transporter, nicotianamine synthase, and ferritin gene cassette. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 130.

Bouis, H. E. (2003). Micronutrient fortification of plants through plant breeding: Can it improve nutrition in man at low cost? Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 62(2), 403-411.

Bouis, H. E., & Saltzman, A. (2017). Improving nutrition through biofortification: A review of evidence from HarvestPlus, 2003 through 2016. Global Food Security, 12, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2017.01.009

Broadley, M. R., White, P. J., Hammond, J. P., Zelko, I., & Lux, A. (2007). Zinc in plants. New Phytologist, 173(4), 677-702.

Cakmak, I. (2008). Enrichment of cereal grains with zinc: Agronomic or genetic biofortification? Plant and Soil, 302(1-2), 1-17.

Cakmak, I., & Kutman, U. B. (2018). Agronomic biofortification of cereals with zinc: A review. European Journal of Soil Science, 69(1), 172-180.

Clemens, S., Palmgren, M. G., & Krämer, U. (2013). A long way ahead: Understanding and engineering plant metal accumulation. Trends in Plant Science, 7(6), 309-315.

Drakakaki, G., Marcel, S., Glahn, R. P., Lund, E. K., Pariagh, S., Fischer, R., Christou, P., & Stoger, E. (2005). Endosperm-specific co-expression of recombinant soybean ferritin and Aspergillus phytase in maize results in significant increases in the levels of bioavailable iron. Plant Molecular Biology, 59(6), 869-880.

Dubock, A. (2017). An overview of agriculture, nutrition and fortification, supplementation and biofortification: Golden Rice as an example for enhancing micronutrient intake. Agriculture & Food Security, 6(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-017-0135-3

Garg, M., Sharma, N., Sharma, S., Kapoor, P., Kumar, A., Chunduri, V., & Arora, P. (2018). Biofortified crops generated by breeding, agronomy, and transgenic approaches are improving lives of millions of people around the world. Frontiers in Nutrition, 5, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2018.00012

Ghandilyan, A., Vreugdenhil, D., & Aarts, M. G. (2006). Progress in the genetic understanding of plant iron and zinc nutrition. Physiologia Plantarum, 126(4), 407-417.

Hurrell, R., & Egli, I. (2010). Iron bioavailability and dietary reference values. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 91(5), 1461S-1467S.

Jones, D. L., Cross, P., Withers, P. J., DeLuca, T. H., Robinson, D. A., Quilliam, R. S., Harris, I. M., Chadwick, D. R., & Edwards-Jones, G. (2013). Nutrient stripping: The global disparity between food security and soil nutrient stocks. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50(4), 851-862.

Kobayashi, T., & Nishizawa, N. K. (2012). Iron uptake, translocation, and regulation in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 63, 131-152.

Low, J. W., Mwanga, R. O., Andrade, M., Carey, E., & Ball, A. M. (2017). Tackling vitamin A deficiency with biofortified sweetpotato in sub-Saharan Africa. Global Food Security, 14, 23-30.

Masuda, H., Usuda, K., Kobayashi, T., Ishimaru, Y., Kakei, Y., Takahashi, M., Higuchi, K., Nakanishi, H., Mori, S., & Nishizawa, N. K. (2013). Overexpression of the barley nicotianamine synthase gene HvNAS1 increases iron and zinc concentrations in rice grains. Rice, 2(4), 155-166.

Meenakshi, J. V., Johnson, N. L., Manyong, V. M., DeGroote, H., Javelosa, J., Yanggen, D. R., Naher, F., Gonzalez, C., García, J., & Meng, E. (2010). How cost-effective is biofortification in combating micronutrient malnutrition? An ex ante assessment. World Development, 38(1), 64-75.

Nestel, P., Bouis, H. E., Meenakshi, J. V., & Pfeiffer, W. (2006). Biofortification of staple food crops. The Journal of Nutrition, 136(4), 1064-1067.

Paine, J. A., Shipton, C. A., Chaggar, S., Howells, R. M., Kennedy, M. J., Vernon, G., Wright, S. Y., Hinchliffe, E., Adams, J. L., Silverstone, A. L., & Drake, R. (2005). Improving the nutritional value of Golden Rice through increased pro-vitamin A content. Nature Biotechnology, 23(4), 482-487. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1082

Pfeiffer, W. H., & McClafferty, B. (2007). HarvestPlus: Breeding crops for better nutrition. Crop Science, 47(3), 88-105.

Römheld, V., & Marschner, H. (1986). Evidence for a specific uptake system for iron phytosiderophores in roots of grasses. Plant Physiology, 80(1), 175-180.

Saini, R. K., Nile, S. H., & Park, S. W. (2015). Carotenoids from fruits and vegetables: Chemistry, analysis, occurrence, bioavailability and biological activities. Food Research International, 76, 735-750.

Saltzman, A., Birol, E., Bouis, H. E., Boy, E., De Moura, F. F., Islam, Y., & Pfeiffer, W. H. (2013). Biofortification: Progress toward a more nourishing future. Global Food Security, 2(1), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2013.01.003

Shiferaw, B., Prasanna, B. M., Hellin, J., & Bänziger, M. (2013). Crops that feed the world 6. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by maize in global food security. Food Security, 3(3), 307-327.

Swamy, B. P. M., Rahman, M. A., Inabangan-Asilo, M. A., Amparado, A., Manito, C., Chadha-Mohanty, P., Reinke, R. F., & Slamet-Loedin, I. H. (2016). Advances in breeding for high grain zinc in rice. Rice, 9(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-016-0122-5

Tang, G., Qin, J., Dolnikowski, G. G., Russell, R. M., & Grusak, M. A. (2009). Golden Rice is an effective source of vitamin A. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89(6), 1776-1783. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2008.27119

Tanumihardjo, S. A. (2011). Vitamin A: Biomarkers of nutrition for development. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 94(2), 658S-665S.

Velu, G., Ortiz-Monasterio, I., Cakmak, I., Hao, Y., & Singh, R. P. (2014). Biofortification strategies to increase grain zinc and iron concentrations in wheat. Journal of Cereal Science, 59(3), 365-372.

Wessells, K. R., & Brown, K. H. (2012). Estimating the global prevalence of zinc deficiency: Results based on zinc availability in national food supplies and the prevalence of stunting. PLoS One, 7(11), e50568.

Wheeler, T., & von Braun, J. (2013). Climate change impacts on global food security. Science, 341(6145), 508-513.

White, P. J., & Broadley, M. R. (2009). Biofortification of crops with seven mineral elements often lacking in human diets–iron, zinc, copper, calcium, magnesium, selenium and iodine. New Phytologist, 182(1), 49-84.

World Health Organization. (2009). Global prevalence of vitamin A deficiency in populations at risk 1995-2005. World Health Organization.

World Health Organization. (2015). The global prevalence of anaemia in 2011. World Health Organization.

World Health Organization. (2020). Malnutrition. World Health Organization. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/malnutrition